![]() ![]() Without getting into the he said/she said PR spin, if the two are unable to work a deal, Roku will lose one of the most popular video sources. Google has threatened to remove YouTube from Roku December 9th due to stalled retransmission negotiations surrounding the YouTube TV channel. Likewise, piracy has been a consideration - leading, in fact, to a temporary halt of streaming box sales in Mexico followed by removal of “private channels” there and soon to be dropped here in the US as well.īut under what sorts of conditions might Roku make a browser available? YouTube. Roku acts as a massive content gateway, doing deals with video providers and offering users (and those companies) a side entrance to accessing video could become counter-productive. As highlighted on reddit, there are additional business considerations at play. In fact, we’ve seen a few 3rd party attempts at a Roku Browser app, such as the “private channel” Browser X. But, while Roku doesn’t provide the processing power or underlying Android-based framework of Fire TV, this isn’t a technical limitation as we’ve been doing web (poorly) on television for 25 years. Only Roku employees know for sure, but we can make some educated guesses.įirst, and most likely, is that web browsing just isn’t what Roku’s designed to do and therefore not something they’d prioritize development or support of (despite the many web technologies brought to bear behind the scenes). One redditor wonders why Roku doesn’t offer a web browser. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |